1936 · Royal Eastern Counties Institution, ColchesterInteractive

Raven's Matrices: a test built for testing in noisy kitchens.

John Raven was assistant on Lionel Penrose's survey of families of children labelled mentally deficient. He found the Binet tests nearly impossible to give in crowded homes and the results impossible to interpret. In 1936, in an MSc thesis and a short paper with Penrose, he set out what a better test had to do, then built one: patterns with a piece missing and no words at all.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY · VOL. XVI, PT. 2 · NOV. 1936
A New Series of Perceptual Tests
Preliminary Communication
BY L. S. PENROSE AND J. C. RAVEN
pp. 97–104
Header re-set from journal and abstracting records; not a facsimile.
THE PROBLEM IN THE FIELD

Spearman's student, Penrose's assistant, and a thesis written before its test existed

THE SURVEYPenrose's East Anglian familiesPenrose, a geneticist, was studying the genetic and environmental origins of mental deficiency. That meant giving the Stanford-Binet to every parent and sibling of children the schools had labelled deficient.
THE COMPLAINTHomes, not laboratoriesRaven found the tests cumbersome in homes, schools and workplaces, with relatives anxious to help, no separate room and a lot of noise. The scores mixed so many things together that they were impossible to interpret.
THE THESISCriteria first, test secondHis 1936 University of London MSc, Mental Tests Used in Genetic Studies, set out the operational criteria a test should meet, for a test that did not yet exist. Francis Aveling at King's College was his formal supervisor.
THE BUILDTwo Ravens and a grantWith a Darwin Trust grant, Raven and his wife Mary Elizabeth Wild, his assistant throughout his life, built the items to fit the criteria.

Raven aimed at the two parts of Spearman's g. Eductive ability, making sense of complexity, would be measured by the matrices. Reproductive ability, storing and recalling information, would be measured by a vocabulary test later called the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale.

3 × 3 · ONE CELL MISSING · SIX OPTIONS

Find the rule, then the missing piece

Raven's items use 2×2 to 6×6 layouts with six to eight options. These three were made for this page and get harder, as items do within a Raven set.

?
Pick the option that completes the grid. The rule is revealed after you answer.
A RULER, NOT A HEAP · SIMULATED

Every item had to keep its rank at every level of ability

Raven wanted the order of item difficulty to be the same for weak and strong takers alike, so the set would work like a ruler. To check, he plotted how the chance of passing each item rose with ability. These are what item response theory later called item characteristic curves. When Georg Rasch developed his model in the late 1950s, he tested it on the matrices.

Slide ability up and down. Good items keep their order. Switch on a badly built item and watch it overtake others: Raven would have changed or dropped it.

TAKER ABILITY+0.0
Item 1
96%
Item 2
83%
Item 3
50%
Item 4
17%
Item 5
4%
Items 1–5 keep the same order at every ability level: easier items are always more likely to be passed.
Simulated logistic curves; the difficulties are not Raven's.
60 ITEMS · FIVE SETS OF TWELVE

Cyclical in the booklet, a single climb for the Army

The Standard booklet runs sets A to E, each starting easy and getting harder, so the taker relearns the format five times. For the wartime services, after validation, a 20-minute version put the items in a single order of difficulty.

A · B · C · D · E
SPM · 1938Standard Progressive MatricesSets A–E, 12 items each, black on white. The original form, published by H. K. Lewis, London.
CPMColoured Progressive MatricesSets A, Ab and B (36 items) on coloured backgrounds, for children of 5–11, older people and those with impairments; the last B items return to black on white.
APMAdvanced Progressive Matrices48 items: Set I (12) and Set II (36), for able adolescents and adults.
1998Parallel forms and SPM PlusParallel versions with matched solution rates, because the classic items had become too well known. SPM Plus restored difficulty at the top.

Bar heights illustrate the ordering principle only; real item difficulties are not shown.

1936 TO PEARSON

A research tool that every recruit sat

1902Born in London, 28 June. He works as a teacher, then head teacher, at a boarding school for physically disabled children, and becomes friendly with Spearman as an undergraduate.
1936MSc thesis; Penrose & Raven, “A new series of perceptual tests,” British Journal of Medical Psychology 16(2), November.
1938Standard Progressive Matrices first published. Raven's biographers say first versions of the coloured form appeared the same year.Many later sources date the Coloured form to 1947.
1939–41Papers on the “R.E.C.I. series of perceptual tests” (1939) and the Standardisation of Progressive Matrices, 1938 (1941). H. K. Lewis issues Progressive Matrices with instructions, key and norms (1940).
1942From this year all entrants to the British armed forces sit a 20-minute version; officer candidates take an adapted version at War Office Selection Boards.
1944Part-time Director of Psychological Research at the Crichton Royal Hospital, Dumfries, studying the normal to throw light on the abnormal. Also publishes Controlled Projection.
1950sGeorg Rasch develops his measurement model and tests it on the matrices.
1964 · 1970Retires in May 1964; dies in Dumfries, 10 August 1970.
1972His three sons found J C Raven Ltd. in Scotland to publish the tests.
1987Flynn's “Massive IQ gains in 14 nations” draws on conscript matrices data.
1998Parallel forms and Standard Progressive Matrices Plus.
2004 →Harcourt Assessment buys J C Raven Ltd.; Harcourt is later bought by Pearson.
WHY CONSCRIPT DATA MATTERED
Same test, many cohorts, rising scores

Because many armies gave the Standard matrices to every conscript for decades, James Flynn could compare generations on an identical test. His 1987 paper on “massive IQ gains in 14 nations” put the rise beyond reasonable doubt. Robert Thorndike, and John Raven Jr. with matrices data, had reported gains before him.

RAVEN'S OWN POINT
High heritability is not low mutability

Twin studies found matrices scores substantially heritable, while conscript data showed them rising fast across generations. Raven kept saying that both can be true at once: a trait can be strongly inherited within a generation and still shift a great deal between generations.

REFERENCES

Sources cited on this page

  1. [1]Penrose, L. S., & Raven, J. C. (1936). A new series of perceptual tests: Preliminary communication. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 16(2), 97–104.doiUsed for: Hero header, date.
  2. [2]Raven, J. C. (1936). Mental tests used in genetic studies: The performance of related individuals on tests mainly educative and mainly reproductive. MSc thesis, University of London.via Wikipedia summaryUsed for: Thesis title and approach.
  3. [3]Raven, J., & Raven, J. (2018). John Carlyle Raven and his legacy.eyeonsociety.co.ukUsed for: Biography underlying the Wikipedia account.
  4. [4]Wikipedia. John C. Raven.en.wikipedia.orgUsed for: Fieldwork, criteria, Darwin Trust, item curves, Rasch, 1938 forms, 20-minute version, Crichton Royal, heritability point.
  5. [5]Wikipedia. Raven's Progressive Matrices.en.wikipedia.orgUsed for: Forms and set structure, 1942 armed forces, WOSB, publishers, 1998 parallel forms, Flynn.
  6. [6]Raven, J. C. (1939). The R.E.C.I. series of perceptual tests: An experimental survey. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 18(1), 16–34.cited in [4]Used for: 1939 paper.
  7. [7]Raven, J. C. (1941). Standardisation of Progressive Matrices, 1938. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19(1), 137–150.cited in [4]Used for: 1938 standardization.
  8. [8]Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–191.doiUsed for: Conscript data and gains.
  9. [9]Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404–431.doiUsed for: Raven's note on homogeneous overlapping problems (via arXiv review).
EDITORIAL RECORD

What changed in this revision

Neither the 1936 paper nor the MSc thesis was read; their content comes through Raven's biographers and reference entries. No Raven items are reproduced, and the three puzzles are original.

  • REMOVED“The world's most-used non-verbal IQ test.” No source given.
  • CORRECTEDWhy Raven built it: the old page said the Binet was “too verbal for translators” and performance kits “too heavy.” Raven's own reasons were testing in crowded homes and uninterpretable composite scores.
  • FLAGGEDColoured Progressive Matrices date: 1938 first versions per Raven's biographers; 1947 elsewhere, including our CPM page.
  • ADDED1936 header, fieldwork story, item-curve simulator, cyclical vs single-order view, form cards, timeline 1902–Pearson, Flynn and heritability, and 9 references.
  • KEPTThe three original matrix puzzles.
KEEP EXPLORING

Related historical tests

Part of the Historical IQ Tests Archive. Editorial content under CC BY-SA 4.0. Raven's Progressive Matrices are published by Pearson; no items are reproduced.

Liked the matrices? Try the full four domains.

Our modern IQ test reports on contemporary norms (mean 100, SD 15), in about 30 minutes.

Take the modern IQ test →