Categories versus a continuum
The terms idiot, imbecile and moron are quoted as historical classifications. They are no longer used clinically.
Draw the line anywhere. Someone is just across it.
If ability varies continuously, any cutoff separates children who are almost identical. Move the line and see how many simulated children sit within a few points of it on either side.
A simulated normal distribution of 2,000 scores (mean 100, SD 15). This isn't Norsworthy's data. It illustrates the logic of her argument, not her numbers.
From Morristown classroom to Columbia faculty
References
- [1]Wikipedia contributors. Naomi Norsworthy (accessed 1 Oct 2026).en.wikipedia.org
- [2]Norsworthy, N. (1906). The psychology of mentally deficient children. New York. Internet Archive (Library of Congress copy).archive.org
- [3]The psychology of mentally deficient children (catalogue record: thesis, Columbia; also Archives of Psychology no. 1, Nov. 1906). Library of Congress.loc.gov
- [4]Columbia University, history of psychology at. Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology. Springer.link.springer.com
- [5]The Psychology of Mentally Deficient Children (reprint edition, publisher's description). Forgotten Books via Amazon.amazon.com
- [6]Feeble-mindedness: a review by the editor of the Journal of Heredity. PubMed Central.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Related historical tests
Binet and Simon built a scale to separate children held back by schooling from those with an intellectual deficit. Norsworthy tackled the same population in New York with a statistical comparison.
Goddard used the Binet scale to sort people into grades by mental age. That categorical framing stands in contrast to Norsworthy's continuous one.
Norsworthy trained at Columbia's Teachers College, part of the university where Cattell had run his testing programme. Her work applied that measurement tradition to children in institutions.
Terman's IQ placed everyone on a single scale. Later deviation scores made that continuous view the standard way to report ability.