What is inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is the ability to infer a general rule from specific examples and use it to predict what comes next.
Tests measure it with number series, letter series, figure sequences and "which belongs to the group" items. It is a core part of fluid intelligence, and unlike deduction its conclusions are only ever probable: a new example could always break the rule.
By What's Your IQ · Published 3 Oct 2026 · Updated 3 Oct 2026- Format
- Series or sets with a hidden rule and 4–5 options
- Question types
- Number series, letter series, find the rule, figure series
- Typical employer test
- 20–30 items in 20–30 minutes
- Measures
- Pattern detection, hypothesis testing, fluid reasoning
- This test
- 12 puzzles, 12 minutes, free, explained answers
Examples → rule
3, 6, 9, 12 … so: +3 each timeThe conclusion is the best explanation of what you've seen. It's probable, not guaranteed: the next term could be 16 if the real rule were something stranger.The difference table
The fastest general method for number series. Subtract neighbours until a row stops changing, then build back up.Six patterns to check first
Simon and Kotovsky (1963) showed most series are built from a few repeating operations. Try them in this order.Take the test
12 puzzles · 12 minutes · scratch paper allowedTest the cases that could prove you wrong.
In the original 2-4-6 study, most people announced a wrong rule at least once, usually something like "even numbers rising by two". They kept testing triples that fitted their guess and never one that didn't.
How to solve a number series with a difference table
- 1Write the differences between each pair of neighbouring numbers.
- 2If those differences aren't constant, take the differences of the differences.
- 3When a row becomes constant, extend it by one and add back up to get the next term. If no row settles, try ratios instead.
Keep going
- Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140.
- Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (2008). Inductive reasoning: A training approach. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 85–123.
- Heit, E. (2000). Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 569–592.
- Simon, H. A., & Kotovsky, K. (1963). Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 70(6), 534–546.