Reasoning/Critical thinking
ARGUMENTS · EVIDENCE · ASSUMPTIONS

Sounding right isn't being right.

Critical thinking tests check whether you can tell the difference: what an argument quietly assumes, what the evidence actually supports, and which reasons carry weight.

TRY IT · ADD EVIDENCE, WATCH THE ARGUMENT MOVE“City traffic fell after the new bus line opened, so the bus line reduced traffic.”
WEAKAS STATEDSTRONG
The argument assumes the bus line is the cause. Add facts and see which ones matter.

What is a critical thinking test?

A critical thinking test measures how well you evaluate information and arguments: drawing sound inferences, spotting unstated assumptions, judging whether conclusions follow, and weighing the strength of reasons.

It overlaps with deductive reasoning, but goes further. Logic asks whether a conclusion follows from its premises; critical thinking also asks whether the premises are credible, what's missing, and what the argument takes for granted. The best-known format is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, widely used in law and management recruitment.

By What's Your IQ · Published 4 Oct 2026 · Updated 4 Oct 2026
Format
A short passage or argument, then a judgement
Answer styles
True–false scale, made / not made, follows / doesn't, strong / weak
Employer versions
Around 40 items in about 30 minutes
This test
10 items, 12 minutes, free, worked answers

Five skills, five ways to answer

Each Watson-Glaser section asks a different question and uses its own answer scale. Pick one to see how it works.
THE QUESTION IT ASKSHow likely is this, given only the passage?You rate a proposed inference on a five-point scale. “True” means it must follow; “insufficient data” means the passage simply doesn't say.
TrueProbably trueInsufficient dataProbably falseFalse
WORKED EXAMPLEPassage: sales rose 10% in the quarter the new manager started. Inference: the new manager caused the rise.Insufficient data.The timing fits, but nothing in the passage connects the manager to the sales.

Take the test

10 items · 12 minutes · judge only from what's given
Inference2 itemsAssumptions2 itemsDeduction2 itemsInterpretation1 itemEvaluation3 items

Six traps the test is built around

Each sounds convincing in the moment. Name it, and it stops working on you.
Unrepresentative sample“Everyone I know supports this policy, so most citizens must.”Who was asked, and are they like the people the conclusion is about?
After, so because“Traffic fell after the bus line opened, so the bus line did it.”What else changed at the same time?
Appeal to authority“A famous economist says this diet works.”Is the source an expert in this, and what is the evidence?
False choice“Either we cut the budget or the company fails.”Are there really only two options?
Loaded wording“This reckless scheme will waste taxpayers' money.”Strip the adjectives. What claim is left?
Filling the gap“Lena hasn't approved it, so the budget isn't final.”Am I adding a fact the passage never gave me?

Keep going

References
  1. Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Psychological Corporation.
  2. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.
  3. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.