What is a critical thinking test?
A critical thinking test measures how well you evaluate information and arguments: drawing sound inferences, spotting unstated assumptions, judging whether conclusions follow, and weighing the strength of reasons.
It overlaps with deductive reasoning, but goes further. Logic asks whether a conclusion follows from its premises; critical thinking also asks whether the premises are credible, what's missing, and what the argument takes for granted. The best-known format is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, widely used in law and management recruitment.
By What's Your IQ · Published 4 Oct 2026 · Updated 4 Oct 2026- Format
- A short passage or argument, then a judgement
- Answer styles
- True–false scale, made / not made, follows / doesn't, strong / weak
- Employer versions
- Around 40 items in about 30 minutes
- This test
- 10 items, 12 minutes, free, worked answers
Five skills, five ways to answer
Each Watson-Glaser section asks a different question and uses its own answer scale. Pick one to see how it works.THE QUESTION IT ASKSHow likely is this, given only the passage?You rate a proposed inference on a five-point scale. “True” means it must follow; “insufficient data” means the passage simply doesn't say.
TrueProbably trueInsufficient dataProbably falseFalse
WORKED EXAMPLEPassage: sales rose 10% in the quarter the new manager started. Inference: the new manager caused the rise.Insufficient data.The timing fits, but nothing in the passage connects the manager to the sales.
Take the test
10 items · 12 minutes · judge only from what's givenInference2 itemsAssumptions2 itemsDeduction2 itemsInterpretation1 itemEvaluation3 items
Six traps the test is built around
Each sounds convincing in the moment. Name it, and it stops working on you.Keep going
References
- Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Psychological Corporation.
- Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.