Home/IQ score chart/Intelligence scale
ONE SCORE · SIX CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

The intelligence scale: the numbers stayed, the words kept changing.

Pick a score. Each system that has labelled IQ since 1916 gives its word for it. The bands shift, some words were retired as insults, and none of them is a diagnosis on its own.

128
IQ 128 ACROSS A CENTURY

Six systems, side by side

Each bar is one system's bands from IQ 40 to 170. The line is your score; the highlighted band is what it was called. Hover a band for its range.

1916Terman, Stanford-Binet
Very superior120–139
1939Wechsler-Bellevue
Very superior128+
2003Stanford-Binet 5
Superior120–129
2008WAIS-IV
Superior120–129
2014WISC-V
Very high120–129
1994–2013DSM-IV (IQ-based severity)
Not in the disability range71+
4070100130170
2008 · CLICK ANY ROW ABOVEWAIS-IV

The 2008 adult scale kept 10-point bands centred on 100 and still used 'Borderline' for 70–79 and 'Very superior' for 130+.

The manual stresses that labels describe the score, not the person, and should be read with the confidence interval.

RANGELABELSHARE
130+Very superior2.5%
120–129Superior7.2%
110–119High average17%
90–109Average49%
80–89Low average16%
70–79Borderline6.5%
≤69Extremely low2.1%
Share of a normal population (mean 100, SD 15) in each band. For Terman's ratio IQs the true shares differed by age.

Checked Oct 2026: Wechsler-Bellevue bands and shares (128+ = 2.2%, 120–127 = 6.7%, 111–119 = 16.1%) as quoted from Wechsler's Measurement of Adult Intelligence; WAIS-IV and SB5 tables (SB5 "very gifted" corrected to 140+); Terman's top bands (140+, 120–140) match standard reproductions. DSM-IV ranges are approximate and overlap by design.

WHY 1916 AND 1939 AREN'T THE SAME SCALE

Ratio IQ broke for adults; the deviation IQ fixed it

Terman's IQ divided mental age by real age. That works while children's performance grows every year, but adult test performance levels off in the late teens. Divide a flat mental age by a rising real age and every adult appears to decline. Terman's workaround capped the real-age divisor at 16.

Wechsler dropped the ratio altogether. A deviation IQ ranks you against people your own age, so a 40-year-old and a 9-year-old with IQ 115 are both one SD above their peers. Every modern band is set on that footing.

RATIO IQ120MA ÷ CA × 100
TERMAN, AGE CAPPED AT 16120MA ÷ min(CA, 16) × 100
For children the ratio behaves: a 10-year-old performing like a typical 12-year-old scores 120. But how rare that is still depends on age, because the spread of mental ages widens as children grow.
A LABEL IS A PROBABILITY

How likely is IQ 128 to belong in each WAIS-IV band?

Very superior
31%
Superior
69%
High average
<1%
Average
<1%
Low average
<1%
Borderline
<1%
Extremely low
<1%

Every score carries measurement error. A full-scale Wechsler IQ has a standard error of roughly 2–3 points; short screeners and online tests run nearer 5 or more. Near a band edge, the honest label is "probably X, possibly Y". Reports therefore give a confidence interval, and good ones name both bands when the interval crosses a line.

LANGUAGE THAT AGED BADLY

Clinical terms that became insults, and what replaced them

Listed for history only. Current systems (DSM-5, ICD-11) define intellectual disability by both measured ability and adaptive functioning, and grade severity mainly on adaptive functioning.

THE TOP OF THE SCALE

"Gifted" has no single line

School programmes pick cut-offs from about 120 to 130, often as a percentile, and many add achievement or teacher ratings. Beyond 130, Miraca Gross's levels (moderately, highly, exceptionally, profoundly gifted) are widely quoted, even though tests rarely measure reliably that far out.

AT OR ABOVE IQ 1302.3%Two SD: Mensa, many programmes. About 1 in 44 people on a normal curve.
WHAT A BAND CAN'T DECIDE

Three decisions that need more than a score

Intellectual disability
1Measured ability about two SD below the mean, allowing for error
2Deficits in adaptive functioning: everyday conceptual, social and practical skills
3Onset during the developmental period

A score of 68 alone is not a diagnosis; a score of 72 does not rule one out.

Gifted programme entry
1Ability score, often a percentile cut-off set locally
2Achievement, portfolios or teacher and parent ratings
3Sometimes local norms, to widen access in under-served schools

Cut-offs vary by district and country; the band label is rarely the gate.

Learning disability
1Specific difficulty in reading, writing or maths
2Persisting despite targeted teaching
3Not better explained by general ability, sensory or other factors

Older 'IQ–achievement discrepancy' rules have largely given way to response-to-intervention approaches.

REFERENCES
  1. Terman, L. M. (1916). The Measurement of Intelligence. Houghton Mifflin.
  2. Wechsler, D. (1939). The Measurement of Adult Intelligence. Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition: Technical Manual. Riverside.
  4. Wechsler, D. (2008, 2014). WAIS-IV and WISC-V Technical and Interpretive Manuals. Pearson.
  5. American Psychiatric Association (1994; 2013). DSM-IV and DSM-5.
  6. Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally Gifted Children (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
  7. Rosa's Law, Pub. L. 111-256 (2010).
  8. World Health Organization (2019/2022). ICD-11: Disorders of intellectual development (6A00).
  9. Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M. J. (2021). Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports (12th ed.). AAIDD.

Where would you sit on the scale?

Take the full IQ test and see your score across every system above.

Start the IQ test