2007

Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity. (中文)

Michael J. Kane, Andrew R. A. Conway, Timothy K. Miura, Gregory J. H. Colflesh

Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

921 次引用
PsychologyWorking memoryMemory spanConstruct validityCognitive psychologyn-backConstruct (python library)CognitionRaven's Progressive

摘要

The N-back task requires participants to decide whether each stimulus in a sequence matches the one that appeared n items ago. Although N-back has become a standard "executive" working memory (WM) measure in cognitive neuroscience, it has been subjected to few behavioral tests of construct validity. A combined experimental- correlational study tested the attention-control demands of verbal 2- and 3-back tasks by presenting n = 1 "lure" foils. Lures elicited more false alarms than control foils in both 2- and 3-back tasks, and lures caused more misses to targets that immediately followed them compared with control targets, but only in 3-back tasks. N-back thus challenges control over familiarity-based responding. Participants also completed a verbal WM span task (operation span task) and a marker test of general fluid intelligence (Gf; Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices Test; J. C. Raven, J. E. Raven, & J. H. Court, 1998). N-back and WM span correlated weakly, suggesting they do not reflect primarily a single construct; moreover, both accounted for independent variance in Gf. N-back has face validity as a WM task, but it does not demonstrate convergent validity with at least 1 established WM measure.

如何引用

Michael J. Kane, Andrew R. A. Conway, Timothy K. Miura, Gregory J. H. Colflesh (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615