Definition and Overview
Concept
Genetic drift: stochastic change in allele frequencies due to random sampling of gametes across generations. Occurs independently of natural selection. Affects all sexually reproducing populations.
Historical Context
Term coined by Sewall Wright (1930s). Early population genetics emphasized drift’s role alongside selection and mutation. Central to modern evolutionary synthesis.
Scope
Relevant in small populations. Causes divergence among isolated populations. Contributes to genetic differentiation and speciation.
"Drift is the mechanism of evolution arising from random sampling error in finite populations." -- Motoo Kimura
Mechanism of Genetic Drift
Random Sampling
Alleles passed to next generation sampled randomly from gene pool. Sampling variance causes allele frequency fluctuations.
Generational Impact
Each generation: new allele frequencies differ slightly due to chance. Cumulative effect leads to divergence or fixation.
Neutral Alleles
Drift primarily affects neutral or nearly neutral alleles. Selection does not bias their frequency changes.
Effects on Populations
Genetic Variation Loss
Drift reduces heterozygosity over time, decreasing genetic diversity within populations.
Population Divergence
Random differences accumulate among isolated populations, increasing genetic differentiation (FST).
Random Fixation
Alleles may become fixed or lost purely by chance, independent of fitness.
Bottleneck Effect
Definition
Severe reduction in population size causing drastic genetic drift. Survivors’ allele frequencies may not reflect original population.
Consequences
Loss of rare alleles, reduced heterozygosity, altered allele frequencies. Increased inbreeding and genetic load risk.
Examples
Northern elephant seal bottleneck; cheetah population crash; human populations after natural disasters.
Founder Effect
Definition
New population established by few individuals carrying limited genetic variation. Drift effects amplified in founders.
Genetic Consequences
Reduced diversity, potential fixation of rare alleles, altered allele frequencies relative to source population.
Examples
Amish communities, island colonizations, invasive species founder events.
Influence of Population Size
Effective Population Size (Ne)
Ne determines magnitude of drift. Smaller Ne = stronger drift effects. Ne often less than census size.
Inverse Relationship
Drift magnitude ∝ 1/Ne. Large populations: drift slower, selection dominates. Small populations: drift dominates.
Demographic Fluctuations
Population bottlenecks, founder events reduce Ne temporarily, increasing drift impact.
| Population Size (Ne) | Drift Impact |
|---|---|
| < 100 | Strong drift, rapid allele frequency changes |
| 100 - 1000 | Moderate drift, interaction with selection |
| > 1000 | Weak drift, selection predominates |
Allele Fixation and Loss
Definition
Fixation: allele frequency reaches 100%. Loss: allele frequency reaches 0%. Both can occur by drift.
Probability of Fixation
Neutral allele fixation probability equals its initial frequency. Rare alleles less likely to fix.
Time to Fixation
Dependent on Ne and initial frequency. Smaller populations fix alleles faster due to stronger drift.
Expected time to fixation (neutral allele):t ≈ 4Ne generations (diploid population)Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Concept
Most molecular variation caused by genetic drift of neutral mutations rather than selection.
Motoo Kimura’s Contribution
Proposed neutral mutations fix via drift, explaining molecular clock constancy.
Implications
Drift fundamental to molecular evolution. Selection important but not sole driver of variation.
Interaction with Natural Selection
Opposing Forces
Selection favors advantageous alleles; drift causes random changes. Balance depends on Ne and selection coefficient (s).
Selection Coefficient vs Drift
If |Ns| << 1 (N=Ne, s=selection coefficient), drift dominates. If |Ns| >> 1, selection prevails.
Examples
Weakly selected alleles behave neutrally in small populations. Strong selection overrides drift in large populations.
Condition for drift dominance:|Ne * s| < 1 → drift > selectionMathematical Models
Wright-Fisher Model
Discrete generations, fixed Ne, binomial sampling of alleles. Baseline drift model.
Moran Model
Overlapping generations, continuous time. One birth and one death per time step.
Diffusion Approximations
Continuous approximation of allele frequency changes. Used to calculate fixation probabilities and times.
| Model | Key Features | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Wright-Fisher | Discrete generations, binomial sampling | Basic drift simulations |
| Moran | Overlapping generations, continuous time | Population genetics with overlapping generations |
| Diffusion Approximation | Continuous allele frequency changes | Fixation probabilities, time estimates |
Empirical Examples
Island Populations
Isolated islands show allele frequency divergence due to founder effects and drift.
Endangered Species
Small populations of cheetahs, Florida panthers show reduced genetic diversity from drift.
Human Populations
Founder effects in Ashkenazi Jews, Amish communities demonstrate drift’s role in allele frequency changes.
Implications for Conservation Genetics
Maintaining Genetic Diversity
Minimize drift by preserving large effective population sizes. Avoid bottlenecks and fragmentation.
Inbreeding Depression
Drift increases homozygosity, exposing deleterious recessive alleles, reducing fitness.
Management Strategies
Gene flow introduction, captive breeding programs, habitat restoration reduce drift effects.
References
- Kimura M., "The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution," Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 1-367.
- Wright S., "Evolution in Mendelian Populations," Genetics, vol. 16, 1931, pp. 97-159.
- Hartl D.L., Clark A.G., "Principles of Population Genetics," 4th ed., Sinauer Associates, 2007, pp. 1-682.
- Nei M., "Molecular Evolutionary Genetics," Columbia University Press, 1987, pp. 1-512.
- Frankham R., Ballou J.D., Briscoe D.A., "Introduction to Conservation Genetics," 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 1-617.